Mysql存储日期类型用int、timestamp还是datetime?
发布:smiling 来源: PHP粉丝网 添加日期:2014-09-24 20:47:39 浏览: 评论:0
通常存储时间用datetime类型,现在很多系统也用int存储时间,它们有什么区别?个人更喜欢使用int这样对于日期计算时比较好,下面我们一起来看到底那种会好些.
int
(1).4个字节存储,INT的长度是4个字节,存储空间上比datatime少,int索引存储空间也相对较小,排序和查询效率相对较高一点点
(2)可读性极差,无法直观的看到数据,可能让你很恼火
TIMESTAMP
(1)4个字节储存
(2)值以UTC格式保存
(3)时区转化 ,存储时对当前的时区进行转换,检索时再转换回当前的时区。
(4)TIMESTAMP值不能早于1970或晚于2037
datetime
(1)8个字节储存
(2)与时区无关
(3)以'YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS'格式检索和显示DATETIME值。支持的范围为'1000-01-01 00:00:00'到'9999-12-31 23:59:59'
mysql也是这两年才流行,性能越来越来,具体怎么存储看个人习惯和项目需求吧.
分享两篇关于int vs timestamp vs datetime性能测试的文章.
- Myisam:MySQL DATETIME vs TIMESTAMP vs INT 测试仪
- CREATE TABLE `test_datetime` (
- `id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
- `datetime` FIELDTYPE NOT NULL,
- PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
- ) ENGINE=MyISAM;
机型配置
- kip-locking
- key_buffer = 128M
- max_allowed_packet = 1M
- table_cache = 512
- sort_buffer_size = 2M
- read_buffer_size = 2M
- read_rnd_buffer_size = 8M
- myisam_sort_buffer_size = 8M
- thread_cache_size = 8
- query_cache_type = 0
- query_cache_size = 0
- thread_concurrency = 4
测试
- DATETIME 14111 14010 14369 130000000
- TIMESTAMP 13888 13887 14122 90000000
- INT 13270 12970 13496 90000000
执行mysql
- mysql> select * from test_datetime into outfile ‘/tmp/test_datetime.sql’;
- Query OK, 10000000 rows affected (6.19 sec)
- mysql> select * from test_timestamp into outfile ‘/tmp/test_timestamp.sql’;
- Query OK, 10000000 rows affected (8.75 sec)
- mysql> select * from test_int into outfile ‘/tmp/test_int.sql’;
- Query OK, 10000000 rows affected (4.29 sec)
- alter table test_datetime rename test_int;
- alter table test_int add column datetimeint INT NOT NULL;
- update test_int set datetimeint = UNIX_TIMESTAMP(datetime);
- alter table test_int drop column datetime;
- alter table test_int change column datetimeint datetime int not null;
- select * from test_int into outfile ‘/tmp/test_int2.sql’;
- drop table test_int;
- So now I have exactly the same timestamps from the DATETIME test, and it will be possible to reuse the originals for TIMESTAMP tests as well.
- mysql> load data infile ‘/export/home/ntavares/test_datetime.sql’ into table test_datetime;
- Query OK, 10000000 rows affected (41.52 sec)
- Records: 10000000 Deleted: 0 Skipped: 0 Warnings: 0
- mysql> load data infile ‘/export/home/ntavares/test_datetime.sql’ into table test_timestamp;
- Query OK, 10000000 rows affected, 44 warnings (48.32 sec)
- Records: 10000000 Deleted: 0 Skipped: 0 Warnings: 44
- mysql> load data infile ‘/export/home/ntavares/test_int2.sql’ into table test_int;
- Query OK, 10000000 rows affected (37.73 sec)
- Records: 10000000 Deleted: 0 Skipped: 0 Warnings: 0
- As expected, since INT is simply stored as is while the others have to be recalculated. Notice how TIMESTAMP still performs worse, even though uses half of DATETIME storage size.
- Let’s check the performance of full table scan:
- mysql> SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE count(id) FROM test_datetime WHERE datetime > ‘1970-01-01 01:30:00′ AND datetime < ‘1970-01-01 01:35:00′;
- +———–+
- | count(id) |
- +———–+
- | 211991 |
- +———–+
- 1 row in set (3.93 sec)
- mysql> SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE count(id) FROM test_timestamp WHERE datetime > ‘1970-01-01 01:30:00′ AND datetime < ‘1970-01-01 01:35:00′;
- +———–+
- | count(id) |
- +———–+
- | 211991 |
- +———–+
- 1 row in set (9.87 sec)
- mysql> SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE count(id) FROM test_int WHERE datetime > UNIX_TIMESTAMP(’1970-01-01 01:30:00′) AND datetime < UNIX_TIMESTAMP(’1970-01-01 01:35:00′);
- +———–+
- | count(id) |
- +———–+
- | 211991 |
- +———–+
- 1 row in set (15.12 sec)
- Then again, TIMESTAMP performs worse and the recalculations seemed to impact, so the next good thing to test seemed to be without those recalculations: find the equivalents of those UNIX_TIMESTAMP() values, and use them instead:
- mysql> select UNIX_TIMESTAMP(’1970-01-01 01:30:00′) AS lower, UNIX_TIMESTAMP(’1970-01-01 01:35:00′) AS bigger;
- +——-+——–+
- | lower | bigger |
- +——-+——–+
- | 1800 | 2100 |
- +——-+——–+
- 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
- mysql> SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE count(id) FROM test_int WHERE datetime > 1800 AND datetime < 2100;
- +———–+//开源软件:phpfensi.com
- | count(id) |
- +———–+
- | 211991 |
- +———–+
- 1 row in set (1.94 sec)
Tags: Mysql存储日期 timestamp datetime
- 上一篇:MySQL数据库快速迁移方法
- 下一篇:MYSQL分库分表和不停机更改表结构
相关文章
- ·mysql中TIMESTAMP设置默认时间为当前时间(2014-09-23)
- ·mysql中单表多timestamp设置default问题(2014-09-24)
- ·mysql 5.5与5.6 timestamp 字段 DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIM(2014-09-27)
- ·MySQL日期函数datetime与timestamp的3大区别(2014-10-02)
- ·MySQL中datetime与timestamp用法比较(2014-10-03)
- ·MySQL中CURRENT_TIMESTAMP数据类型详解(2014-10-08)
- ·MySQL的timestamp类型自动更新(2014-10-10)
- ·mysql怎么获取时间戳的函数UNIX_TIMESTAMP(2014-10-10)
- ·mysqldump备份数据后,新插入数据的datetime出错的问题(2014-10-04)
- ·mysql中时间日期 datetime字段保存日期出现0000-00-00(2014-10-12)
推荐文章
热门文章
最新评论文章
- 写给考虑创业的年轻程序员(10)
- PHP新手上路(一)(7)
- 惹恼程序员的十件事(5)
- PHP邮件发送例子,已测试成功(5)
- 致初学者:PHP比ASP优秀的七个理由(4)
- PHP会被淘汰吗?(4)
- PHP新手上路(四)(4)
- 如何去学习PHP?(2)
- 简单入门级php分页代码(2)
- php中邮箱email 电话等格式的验证(2)